tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post8468637694676693465..comments2023-09-22T10:31:03.940-07:00Comments on CODOH Watch: "CODOH" my ass - Bradley Smith's hypocrisySergey Romanovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-84524380092837908142006-04-20T13:10:42.136-07:002006-04-20T13:10:42.136-07:00It appears Bradley has the same delete key as Harg...It appears Bradley has the same delete key as Hargis ;)Sam H.http://www.blogger.com/profile/00696452852820822602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-37458796886990924332006-04-21T07:24:53.116-07:002006-04-21T07:24:53.116-07:00The world of CODOH is Orwellian. I try to stay awa...The world of CODOH is Orwellian. I try to stay away from it.Kiwiwriternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-83781413154084928662006-04-21T19:25:33.303-07:002006-04-21T19:25:33.303-07:00For your information, I was the one who asked Smit...For your information, I was the one who asked Smith to delete my posts from his blog.ASMarquesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-33207088142041293162006-04-22T00:55:09.086-07:002006-04-22T00:55:09.086-07:00"For your information, I was the one who aske..."For your information, I was the one who asked Smith to delete my posts from his blog."<br><br>Why?Sergey Romanovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04663051223953105081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-76760384505178016672006-04-22T04:02:06.000-07:002006-04-22T04:02:06.000-07:00was AS Marques' request to take down the posts...was AS Marques' request to take down the posts before or after I copied them over to RODOH?<br><br>No matter: they're not lost to the Memory Hole. The remarks were made, and show up B.S., Hannover and others as fake free-speechers.Nick Terryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14852758011968360596noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-65410579795292665702006-04-23T00:32:46.240-07:002006-04-23T00:32:46.240-07:00Well, I feel better knowing that:1) The posts were...Well, I feel better knowing that:<br><br>1) The posts were deleted at asmarques request. It was about him and he doesn't really need to give a reason, does he?<br><br>2) The posts were off-topic for Bradley Smith's original blog entry on Jesus and the Mel Gibson film.<br><br>3) The posts were placed at Bradley Smith's personal blog rather on than the his Holocaust blog.<br><br>Still, deleting stuff is not a good idea generally. But, in all fairness, Lipstadt deletes any comment from Revisionists at her blog, regardless, so there you have it.Scott Smithnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-85129939798510688752006-04-23T01:23:08.333-07:002006-04-23T01:23:08.333-07:00But she's not the one calling for open debate....But she's not the one calling for open debate.Sergey Romanovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04663051223953105081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-66081861500556008852006-04-23T10:02:17.186-07:002006-04-23T10:02:17.186-07:00> True, but she's not for free-speech eithe...> True, but she's not for free-speech either, is she?<br><br>Yes she is.<br><br>> And Lipstadt will only snipe at Butz on TV; obviously she doesn't have the courage to debate his supposedly patently-wrong ideas.<br><br>Why should she lend him credibility, by debating him?Sergey Romanovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04663051223953105081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-2634349981918177912006-04-23T22:05:03.736-07:002006-04-23T22:05:03.736-07:00Why should she "lend him credibility" by...Why should she "lend him credibility" by sniping at him instead of with debate? Answer: Because she can do so without accountability since he is thereby unable to confront his detractor's arguments, lies and distortions. You can do that with the confidence of the Saved when you already possess the unalloyed Truth. She's about as much in favor of free-speech as a leopard changing its spots.Scott Smithnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-18795241033090523342006-04-24T00:16:50.333-07:002006-04-24T00:16:50.333-07:00Well, you can't prove that she has no courage ...Well, you can't prove that she has no courage for debate and that she is against free speech. She called for Irving's release, remember? You have no evidence at all that she was not sincere. And if someone refuses to debate the likes of Kent Hovind or flat earthers, this only means that they know that these people are dishonest and/or cranks, not that they're "afraid" of debate.Sergey Romanovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04663051223953105081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-36870049286832414342006-04-24T23:05:30.420-07:002006-04-24T23:05:30.420-07:00SERGEY:<< She called for Irving's releas...SERGEY:<br><br><< She called for Irving's release, remember? You have no evidence at all that she was not sincere. >><br><br>You can tell by the way that she worded it that she wasn't the least bit sincere.<br><br>She may as well have prayed for mercy on the souls of those burned at the stake for heresy.Scott Smithnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-23680939875911567812006-04-25T00:07:41.280-07:002006-04-25T00:07:41.280-07:00> You can tell by the way that she worded it th...> You can tell by the way that she worded it that she wasn't the least bit sincere.<br><br>You can tell by the way that she worded it that she sincere.Sergey Romanovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04663051223953105081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-44325498571604022442006-04-25T17:16:26.156-07:002006-04-25T17:16:26.156-07:00Is-Too/Is-Not.But you're defending Lipstadt an...Is-Too/Is-Not.<br><br>But you're defending Lipstadt and I'm defending Irving.<br><br>I rests me case.<br><br>;-)Scott Smithnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-12025108618890359452006-04-26T08:54:47.976-07:002006-04-26T08:54:47.976-07:00Poor Scott, confused as always. Could not prove an...Poor Scott, confused as always. Could not prove any of his accusations against Lipstadt (thus "Is-Too/Is-Not", which by default means he lost), and brings up defence of Irving, even though that was not the issue here (although Lipstadt's defence of Irving is).<br><br>;-)Sergey Romanovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04663051223953105081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-29051680494518335722009-09-07T10:28:27.179-07:002009-09-07T10:28:27.179-07:00Scott was right. Lidstadt was not sincere.http://l...Scott was right. Lidstadt was not sincere.<br><br>http://lipstadt.blogspot.com/2006/12/more-on-judge-in-irvings-austrian-case.htmlWitilza Visigohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17843037910240160138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-50309774159267053582009-12-30T04:01:44.955-08:002009-12-30T04:01:44.955-08:00Sergey,could you be so kind as to go to this forum...Sergey,<br><br>could you be so kind as to go to this forum and save them from falling in the trap of holocaust denial? If someone can do it, you can. (Aside from the holocaust crap its a pretty decent conspiracy forum - if you like that genre)<br><br>http://www.outlawjournalism.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1244&start=880OpaHenknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200331.post-66233401490876075642009-12-30T05:26:41.271-08:002009-12-30T05:26:41.271-08:00OH, I'm afraid I've no time for setting ne...OH, I'm afraid I've no time for setting newbies straight. Introduce them to RODOH.Sergey Romanovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04063444062099331337noreply@blogger.com