Updates on More Smear & Bitching

Update 1: See my RODOH posts 12163, 12164 and 12165

Update 2: Mr. Lisciotto's characteristic reaction [screenshot].

Question of the day: could it be that renowned Holocaust researcher Chris Webb doesn't know that his associate is barking mad? (That will cause said associate to put together another smear blog and/or a litany of fake comments on the current one, stay tuned.)

Update 3: See my RODOH posts 12189, 12190 and 12191.

Smear-blog-toting coward Carmelo Lisciotto is so predictable ...

More smear & bitching on CODOH (Part 1)

More smear & bitching on CODOH (Part 2)

More Smear & bitching on CODOH (Part 2)

More smear & bitching on CODOH (Part 1)

In his post of Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:34 am, occasional CODOH poster "Karl Radl" produced the following smear:

I apologise for going slightly off-topic, but I wished to add a short personal testimony about Roberto's 'habits'. When my wife went to Poland with a film crew nearly a year ago and Roberto claimed he was going to meet her at one of the Reinhardt camps [I forget which off hand] only for her (and the rest) to get stopped, detained and deported by the Polish police who knew she was coming, knew where she was going, why she was going there and more precisely her name [the former three things are ones that Roberto was one of the only person outside of our family and those we employed to knew about it (whom I have good reason to trust)]. Roberto also made an attempt to claim she 'threatened him' (specifically when he claimed that she was 'going to get him beaten up by skinheads') and our attorney advised her after reading his message that he was angling for a dubious comment or two for him to sue her (as myself and my wife are not poor).

Roberto then claimed she didn't show and that he had won the bet/challenge. You can't prove it was him tipping off the Polish authorities, but it is one of those bits of circumstantial evidence that are suggestive as opposed to conclusive.

These claims are obviously related to my trip to Sobibor from 14 to 16 October 2008. On 15 October I was supposed to meet there with my old friend Greg Gerdes and with a lady who posted on the VNN thread Archaeological Investigations of Treblinka as "Eireann Goddess" (hereinafter "EG"). This lady is obviously the "wife" that "Karl Radl" is referring to.

Neither Gerdes nor EG showed up for our appointment, as I pointed out in my VNN post 1525, written on 16.10.2008 from Wlodawa, Poland.

Greg Gerdes, despite the threatening invective he had sent my way and his bigmouthed challenge to German authorities (see his post 1514: "I publicly challenge the P.O.S. Stasi bastards in Gewmany to put out an arrest warrant for me - ala Toben. Got that you shabbas goy MF's? I DARE YOU.") eventually got cold feet and decided to stay at home. In his post 1521 he claimed that fear of being apprehended had prompted his decision:

Boy, someone would have to be really really stupid to actually think that I would go to Europe after what happened to Toben.

But wait, slamin sam is really really stupid.

Uhmmmm, never mind.

EG, whose last message prior to my trip to Sobibor was her post 1499 (to which I responded in my post 1506), didn't give any reasons for not having shown up. In fact I never heard of her again.

Neither in EG's aforementioned post nor in any previous post that I remember did EG reveal her identity, so it's a mystery to me how I am supposed to have known her name, as "Karl Radl" claims.

As to the "beaten up by skinheads" – thing, KR must be referring to my VNN post 1492, where in response to EG's post 1482 I wrote the following (emphasis added):

Trying to scare me off, baby?

You should have come up with a better story, then. Like some of your NS thugs waiting for me on site to cut my throat. But then, even that wouldn’t impress me.

Of course I think you’re talking a lot of shit here. I don’t think you have contacts with the Polish government, let alone contacts who can assure you that you can’t be bothered for Holocaust denial. And while it seems plausible that you run around with a bunch of NS bodyguards, it’s rather hard to believe that you have an attorney in Poland or accompanying you on your trips into Poland. That is, unless you’re the spoilt rich kid of some Jew-hating moneybags like Willis Carto or the late Robert H. Countess. I also doubt that you are willing to forfeit your treasured anonymity, which you will have to do when meeting me.

But OK, let’s assume it’s not all just bullshit and you will actually be there. In that case I also assume that you will show your face on that video and duly identify yourself, for I won’t consent to being filmed by or together with an anonymous coward. I further assume that you will hand me a copy of that video, and that any public use you make thereof will require my prior consent, just like any public use I make of the video will require your prior consent. I also assume that you will hand me a copy of that video, and that any public use you make thereof will require my prior consent, just like any public use I make of the video will require your prior consent.

When we have properly introduced each other, we can go visit the site and photograph or film any bone fragments or other human remains we may come across. I don’t think the Polish government will object to photographing or filming such objects, provided that we leave them where they are, which of course is my intention. But if they have a problem with that, I’m sure museum director Marek Bern will tell us so and we’ll have to cancel that part of the program.

Needless to say, I don’t exclude the possibility that instead of EG & friends I will meet only a bunch of Polish skinheads or other scum with intentions against my life or personal integrity. It’s nothing that I would put beyond the bloodthirsty little thing. In case that happens, I’ll leave word with people I trust about who is to be held responsible for anything that might happen to me. It would be you as instigator, with Gerdes and PS as possible accomplices.

That said, I look forward to meeting you on 15.10.2008, 10 hours local time, at this place:

[photo of the Sobibor memorial entrance]

As becomes apparent from the above-quoted post, and as can be confirmed by the persons I left word with before departing, I did not know EG's identity at the time. I still don't. So there's no way I could have reported her to any Polish authorities, even if I had known what authorities to turn to and what to report to them, and if I had the inclination to hide from an appointment behind authorities (which, unlike Greg Gerdes, I don't have). As to EG’s supposed travel itinerary, all I knew was that "We will be near Sobibor on the 15th.", as EG had claimed in her post 1482.

All this suggests that KR is either lying or was lied to by his wife, if indeed EG is his wife.

A further indication of mendacity is EG's utter silence when I reported that she had not shown up and Slanim2 followed up with the following remark, in his post 1528:

Roberto kept his word and arrived on time, you showed yourself to be a liar, once again, I wonder what EG's excuse will be.

That would have been the time for EG to claim that she had been held up and turned back by Polish authorities, if indeed such had happened.

But the lady’s silence was deafening.

So the story that her supposed husband all of a sudden comes up with now, about 18 months after my trip to Sobibor, carries a distinct smell of fish, to say the least.

KR’s smear is followed up by some more of jnovitz/lgr’s bitching, which I don't think I need to comment anymore after having shown our readers that the fellow is a inveterate liar. If the resentful old fart should feel like "poking fun" about me at some other place, I'll find out soon enough and go there to pull his bunny ears a little more. As to the petition he is mouthing off about, it is this one:

A Petition to the German Legislator

The more of our readers sign it, the bigger the chance that it will one day go where it is meant to go.

More smear & bitching on CODOH (Part 1)

Kevin Barrett's invitation to a radio debate with Mr. "Dalton" launched some bitching fish-wives on the CODOH Cesspit into an instructive festival of mendacious insinuations, paranoid and somewhat-less-than dishonest suspicions and downright lies about my humble person. In the following I shall have a look at these lowly characters' deplorable utterances, one by one.



First we have my good old friend "Drew J", who in his post of Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:22 am on the thread Dear Andrea Merkel: How much do Raul Hilberg and I owe you? let fly as follows:

Now that's interesting as Roberto has attacked Dalton so many times on his blog. You do know that Roberto will say, "I have already countered Dalton's points on the net so he has to respond to me first. Me not debating him is being turned into me being a chicken by him when he is the chicken for not responding to my posts to his work on my blog." And I think that there is something to this would be stance of Roberto's. I suspect Roberto will ONLY come onto Dalton's show if Dalton promises to let Roberto talk about the issues where he disagrees with Dalton that Roberto already brought up on his blog. After all, if presumably, Dalton never responded to Roberto's critiques, the radio would probably be an acceptable venue for Roberto if Dalton promised he'd deal with Roberto's counters on his blog straight on AND NOTHING ELSE on the radio show.

Actually I followed up my previous blog with the following mail to Kevin Barrett, sent on Wed, April 21, 2010 11:23:06 PM:

An invitation to Mr. "Thomas Dalton"
...
From:
Guadalupe Salcedo [Chat now]
...
View Contact
To: truthjihad@gmail.com; kbarrett@merr.com
Hi Mr. Barrett,

The above is the title of a blog I just wrote on the Holocaust Controversies blog under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/04/invitation-to-mr-thomas-dalton.html , after I learned of your claim to have invited me to a debate with Mr. "Thomas Dalton".

I don't remember having received any mail from you, but maybe I did and inadvertently deleted it because I thought it was spam (as I said in the blog, I only learned of your existence today). So if you did send me a mail, could you please forward it again for my records? Thanks!

As you seem to be in contact with Mr. "Dalton", I would also appreciate if you could inform him of my invitation in the aforementioned blog. Needless to say, you are also invited to have a chat with me on the Usenet, the RODOH Forum, the VNN forum or any other online venue of your choice, provided that I have access to such venue and debate there is not curtailed by a moderator like it is on the "CODOH Revisionist Forum". Just let me know when and where.

Best regards,

Roberto Muehlenkamp

Kevin’s reply, received on Thu, April 22, 2010 2:04:10 PM, was the following:

Fwd: radio invitation, re: holocaust revisionism debunking
...
From:
Kevin Barrett
...
View Contact
To: Guadalupe Salcedo
Cc: Andrew Mathis
Hello Roberto,

Great to hear from you! Below is the message I sent Monday to robert.muehlenkamp@lis1.siemens.pt, webmaster@holocaust-history.org

I'm actually a free-speech-fanatic radio host and 9/11 revisionist, not a holocaust revisionist, and certainly not an online-forum debater on that topic! Since I posted the blog entry you saw, I got in touch with Andrew Mathis, who will rebut Dalton during the second hour of Saturday's show IF we can get him Dalton's book in time (working on it - the publisher will overnight him the book as soon as they get a snailmail address). Meanwhile, are you also available this Saturday, 11-midnight GMT, in case for some reason Andrew can't do it?

Sorry about the email address mixup. I probably should have invited you earlier, instead of concentrating my efforts on professors in Holocaust and Genocide Studies departments, which turned out to be a wild goose chase.

Thanks for getting in touch, and I hope you and/or Andrew will be able to join me for the second hour of Saturday's show.

Kevin

Begin forwarded message:

> Dear Roberto Muehlenkamp,
>
> I noticed that you seem well-informed and willing and able to take on the Holocaust revisionists, and was wondering if you could rebut Thomas Dalton on my radio show this coming Saturday, April 24, 11-midnight GMT. My audience includes many people who are skeptical of all official stories, including those that are true, and Dalton's work has had an impact on some of these people. So I decided to invite Dalton for the first hour of my show, and then bring on someone to rebut him for the second hour. If you can't do that, I would be grateful if you would suggest someone who could.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kevin
> Skype: DrKevinBarrett
> 608-579-1068
>
>
>
> Kevin Barrett
> http://www.truthjihad.com
> Author, Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters: http://www.questioningthewaronterror.com
>
>
>
>

Kevin Barrett
http://www.truthjihad.com
Author, Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters: http://www.questioningthewaronterror.com

Kevin had obviously realized that he had tried to contact me via the wrong e-mail addresses. Andrew Mathis had also contacted him about the radio show in the meantime, and Kevin was asking if I could also be available in case Andrew couldn’t make it. I responded as follows on Thu, April 22, 2010 3:49:41 PM (my comments to Kevin’s remarks are bolded so they can be distinguished more easily):

Re: Fwd: radio invitation, re: holocaust revisionism debunking
...
From:
Guadalupe Salcedo [Chat now]
...
View Contact
To: Kevin Barrett
Cc: Andrew Mathis

Hi Kevin,

Please find below my replies to your e-mail after each paragraph.

Roberto
From: Kevin Barrett
To: Guadalupe Salcedo
Cc: Andrew Mathis
Sent: Thu, April 22, 2010 2:04:10 PM
Subject: Fwd: radio invitation, re: holocaust revisionism debunking

Hello Roberto,

Great to hear from you! Below is the message I sent Monday to robert.muehlenkamp@lis1.siemens.pt, webmaster@holocaust-history.org

First e-mail address ceased to exist a long time ago, and I was never an active member of THHP - all they got there from me is a translation, IIRC.

I'm actually a free-speech-fanatic radio host and 9/11 revisionist, not a holocaust revisionist, and certainly not an online-forum debater on that topic!

I'm sure you'll be glad to sign my petition text, then. You find it under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2008/02/petition-to-german-legislator.html

Since I posted the blog entry you saw, I got in touch with Andrew Mathis, who will rebut Dalton during the second hour of Saturday's show IF we can get him Dalton's book in time (working on it - the publisher will overnight him the book as soon as they get a snailmail address). Meanwhile, are you also available this Saturday, 11-midnight GMT, in case for some reason Andrew can't do it?

Sure, but how would you contact me in Portugal? I can give you my cell phone number, but calling me there will cost you a fortune. Another possibility would be Skype.

Sorry about the email address mixup. I probably should have invited you earlier, instead of concentrating my efforts on professors in Holocaust and Genocide Studies departments, which turned out to be a wild goose chase.

Better luck next time.

Thanks for getting in touch, and I hope you and/or Andrew will be able to join me for the second hour of Saturday's show.

I'll be on standby.

Kevin

Return message from Kevin, Thu, April 22, 2010 4:03:51 PM:

Re: radio invitation, re: holocaust revisionism debunking
...
From:
Kevin Barrett
...
View Contact
To: Guadalupe Salcedo
Cc: Andrew Mathis
Roberto,

Thanks for this.

I just signed your petition.

If you can provide me with a Skype name, American Freedom Radio will be able to use that to contact you at 11 pm GMT. Perhaps you and Andrew could come on together? (Andrew, we'll need a phone number or Skype handle for you.)

As I just informed Andrew, the Kindle edition of the book is available at http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=node%3D1293747011&field-keywords=debating+holocaust+dalton&x=0&y=0 Dalton says it's supposed to drop to 99 cents through the weekend, but last I looked it's still $1.99, which won't go very far in funding revisionism -- it would barely buy a revisionist a cup of coffee here in Wisconsin ;-)

Kevin

I replied by telling Kevin how he could contact me via Skype and requesting him and Andrew to confirm the current time in, respectively, Wisconsin and Philadelphia, so that their time would be correctly matched with mine tonight. Both confirmed and I sent the following message to Kevin on Thu, April 22, 2010 5:45:14 PM:

Re: radio invitation, re: holocaust revisionism debunking
...
From:
Guadalupe Salcedo [Chat now]
...
View Contact
To: Kevin Barrett
Cc: Andrew Mathis
17 hours your time, when you start interviewing "Dalton", is 23 hours my time. I'll be online at that time waiting for your call. If there should be any changes of plan please let me know asap, because I usually do other things on Saturday night.

Roberto

Kevin’s reply on Thu, April 22, 2010 6:54:36 PM was the following:

Re: radio invitation, re: holocaust revisionism debunking
...
From:
Kevin Barrett
...
View Contact
To: Guadalupe Salcedo
Great! You're confirmed. AFR will Skype you at 18 hours my time, 24 hours your time. I appreciate your willingness to devote a Saturday night to this!

I'll soon be posting a notice about the show at http://www.truthjihadradio.blogspot.com If you want to send a short bio, feel free, otherwise I'll do my best.

Kevin

Andrew had in the meantime also confirmed his availability in principle for the time of the show, so Kevin sent another e-mail informing that he would schedule us both. I had one last question to Kevin, which I sent to him on Thu, April 22, 2010 7:07:38 PM:

Re: radio invitation, re: holocaust revisionism debunking
...
From:
Guadalupe Salcedo [Chat now]
...
View Contact
To: Kevin Barrett
Cc: Andrew Mathis
Why not 17 hours your time, 23 hours my time?

Please excuse me if I'm not understanding something, but am I not supposed to listen to your interview with Mr. "Dalton" and then comment his statements?

Kevin’s clarification on Thu, April 22, 2010 7:29:48 PM settled the matter:

Re: radio invitation, re: holocaust revisionism debunking
...
From:
Kevin Barrett
...
View Contact
To: Guadalupe Salcedo
Cc: Andrew Mathis
Sorry -- you should indeed listen to the first hour, beginning at 23 hours your time, by clicking the "listen live" button at http://www.americanfreedomradio.com

As the second hour guests, you and Andrew will get the call from the network at 24 hours your time. Dalton will be off the line, and you both will be on the line, throughout the second hour.

You will not be going head-to-head with Dalton -- though if everyone agrees, we could schedule that kind of show in the future. For now, I think the differences between the two positions will be more clearly articulated without the kinds of interruptions and back-and-forths that would happen with four people on the line at the same time.

Kevin

As our readers can see, I made no conditions whatsoever as concerns the contents or topics of the show. Drew J's wishful thinking again got the better of him. I’ll be listening to what Dalton has to say starting 11 hours GMT tonight, then receive a Skype call from American Freedom Radio and respond to Kevin’s questions and/or comment on the remarks of Mr. "Dalton", whatever is on Kevin's program. Unlike certain persons I always keep my appointments.

The next bitching fish-wife on the CODOH thread thread Dear Andrea Merkel: How much do Raul Hilberg and I owe you? is "jnovitz", who is obviously identical with the repulsive troll who posted on the RODOH forum under many aliases, last as "little grey rabbit". This deplorable fellow is obviously concurring for some "compulsive liar and paranoid wacko of the year" – award in "Revisionist" cloud-cuckoo-land with the smear he sends my way in his posts of Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:13 am and Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:21 am.

From the post of Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:13 am:

There is a good reason why Roberto Muehlenkamp is not allowed on here. He has been caught using adobe acrobat to manipulate screenshots, rountinely misrepresents quotes from printed books, he has been known to attempt to contact employers of internet revisionists to denounce them and may have been involved in the effort to introduce some faked historical material into the deathcamps.org website.

There are no less than 4 lies in this relatively short paragraph.

Lie # 1: "caught using adobe acrobat to manipulate screenshots". What is true is that jnovitz/little gray rabit insistently accused me of having manipulated screenshots, did so on various RODOH threads (Escape from ARC (merge) with understanding Convergence, Understanding Convergence: Eastern European Jews and History as Instrument: Take III and This little Drew J freak seems to be really pissed about me …, among others) and ended up withdrawing with his tail between his legs (or rather his bunny years) after I conclusively demonstrated the imbecility of his accusation in the posts linked to in my post 12150. His nevertheless continuing to peddle this accusation, moreover on a forum that he well knows I have no access to, is further evidence that jnovitz/lgr is the lowliest of scum and that lying comes to him as naturally as breathing.

The same goes for lie # 2: "routinely misrepresents quotes from printed books". Actually there was but one instance in which jnovitz/lgr accused me of having misrepresented a quote from a book, and that accusation was swiftly and conclusively slapped around his ears (see my RODOH posts 12000, 12069 and 12070), whereupon jnovitz/lgr obviously decided to focus on the "screenshot manipulation" nonsense instead.

Lie # 3: "he has been known to attempt to contact employers of internet revisionists to denounce them" is one of this character's older deliberate distortions of facts. What actually happened was that jnovitz/lgr (then writing as "Lamb Supreme" on RODOH) had claimed to be a person by the name of David Phillips, working with the renowned law firm Herbert Smith. I decided to check that claim and thus wrote the following to said law firm, on Mon, February 26, 2007 6:31:11 PM:

Mr. David Phillips
...
From:
Guadalupe Salcedo [Chat now]
...
View Contact
To: contact@herbertsmith.com
Dear Sirs,

My name is Roberto Muehlenkamp, and I am a German citizen domiciled in Portugal.

I am writing to you in my capacity as a moderator of a historical discussion forum that you may find under http://p102.ezboard.com/brodohforum . I thought it might interest you to know that a rather unpleasant character, a Holocaust denier posting under the alias «Lamb Supreme», among others, has claimed to be one of your attorneys or solicitors, by the name of David Phillips.

As I believe this to be a false claim, I hereby kindly ask you to forward this message to Mr. David Phillips, in case you have an attorney or solicitor by that name, so that he may contact me and clear up this matter. Should there be no David Phillips at Herbert Smith LLP, your communication in this sense will be sufficient clarification.

«Lamb Supreme» first claimed to be Mr. David Phillips at Herbert Smith in his post # 11 under [HTML tag edited out]http://p102.ezboard.com/frodohforumfrm10.showMessageRange?topicID=1573.topic&start=21&stop=39 . He repeated the claim in his post # 73 under http://p102.ezboard.com/Will-our-chief-troll-Lamb-Supreme-/frodohforumfrm25.showMessage?topicID=414.topic .

I thank you very much for your attention and remain,

With my best regards,
Roberto Muehlenkamp

Some time after this message, on Wed, March 7, 2007 11:14:08 AM, I received the following e-mail from the real David Phillips, who obviously appreciated my having pointed out that "Lamb Supreme" was falsely claiming to be him:

Unauthorised blogs
...
From:
"Phillips, David"
...
Add to Contacts
To: cortagravatas@yahoo.com
Dear Mr Muehlenkamp,

My name is David Phillips. I am a solicitor at Herbert Smith solicitors in London.

I have recently been passed your email, concerning claims on your website by a poster named "Lamb Supreme" that he is in fact me.

This is completely untrue. I have no idea who "Lamb Supreme" is, or why he is claiming to be me. I have no idea whatsoever how he has found my name, or why he is now claiming to be me.

I should be grateful if you post a message on your site, explaining that I have contacted you and making the following statement :

"My name is David Phillips, a solicitor with the firm of Herbert Smith in London. It has been brought to my attention that someone under the name of "Lamb Supreme" has been posting messages on this site, falsely claiming to be from me. This is absolutely false. I do not know who "Lamb Supreme" is, nor do I know how he has got hold of my name. These posts are absolutely nothing to do with me. Please ignore any further posts from this person in the future."

I would kindly ask you not to post my email address on the site.

Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention.

David

Both messages were at the time posted on the RODOH, on a thread I'll try to find when I have time (the links in my former mail were broken when that thread was moved by a moderator).

So much for my "attempt to contact employers of internet revisionists to denounce them".

Lie # 4: "may have been involved in the effort to introduce some faked historical material into the deathcamps.org website", relates to another of jnovitz/lgr’s idiotic insinuations, expressed in his RODOH post 2820.

The reply to this nonsense in my post 12038 was short and simple:

While lgr goes looking for a new shrink - the current one seems to have failed - , readers are again invited to read the story of the Escape from Sobibor DVD shot passed off as an authentic photograph in this blog:

On the demise of deathcamps.org: how fakes and arrogance killed a great undertaking

In the blog I linked to, as our regular readers will remember, my fellow blogger Sergey Romanov had exposed the carelessness of Mr. Chris Webb, webmaster of the site http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/, that had led this gentleman to fall for a still from the movie "Escape from Sobibor" passed off as a contemporary photo of the Treblinka "tube" by a certain "Andy Schmidt".

The lame comment of jnovitz/lgr ("Well, whoever it was, it was very naughty."), followed by his aforementioned "distortion" accusation or a repetition thereof, can be read in the fellow’s post 2822. The subsequent comment by the poster KentFord9 in his post 3686 shows that Im not the only RODOH poster familiar with jnovitz/lgr's tricks:

This individual reader judges that the bunny remains the lying bunny he has always been, his attempted smear job stopped as dead in its tracks as his 12 man squad in Lithuania. Nice job, Roberto, exposing the charlatan once again.

Having thus shown how jnovitz/little gray rabbit managed to pack four filthy lies into one relatively short paragraph, I turn to the fellow's subsequent paranoid and also somewhat-less-than-honest accusations in his aforementioned two CODOH posts:

Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:13 am:

He, or more likely associates of him, are also suspects for deathcamps.org and H.E.A.R.T being infected with malicious spyware that has them blocked by google at the moment, doubtless a huge and undeserved embarrassment to the legitimate and ethical owners of those domains
Currently if you go to either those sites you are likely to get a "blocked page"

Reported Attack Page!
This web page at www.deathcamps.org has been reported as an attack page and has been blocked based on your security preferences.
Attack pages try to install programs that steal private information, use your computer to attack others, or damage your system.

Some attack pages intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge or permission of their owners.

Given Roberto Muehlenkamp and friends have engaged in a prolonged campaign of internet vilification against these two sites and their owners, to me they seem likely suspects.

In otherwords, by all means wind up Roberto Muehlenkamp, it is a harmless and entertaining sport, but it is pointless to debate someone so dishonest and with so little intellectual integrity. And I think it is a good idea not to do it here.

I should add, my suggestion that Roberto Muehlenkamp has some association with the breaching of the security of the two domains deathcamps.org and holocaustreseachproject.org is only suspicion, based nothing more than past observation of his unscrupulous nature.

Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:21 am:

BUT, I should add also, I visit both sites quite regularly and the first I came aware of it was after Roberto Muehlenkamp mentioned it on the internet saying this
"
Mr. L should contact Google about the site he brags so much about, by the way. I get warning messages when trying to access that site today, like the following:"
ie almost as soon as the infection occurred, Roberto was aware of it. Even more suspiciously it occurred very soon ( a few days) someone with very vague association to H.E.A.R.T published an internet rankings comparison showing that H.E.A.R.T massively outranked Holocaust Controversies blog.

The infection happened literally a few days later. You draw your own conclusions.

Actually I wouldn’t put it past H.E.A.R.T.'s Carmelo Lisciotto to have created said infection himself as a means of smearing his perceived opponents, considering his history of fake smear blogs and other dishonest behavior documented in Sergey Romanov’s series H.E.A.R.T. (holocaustresearchproject.org) exposed, especially the blogs H.E.A.R.T. defenders and their methods and H.E.A.R.T. defenders and their methods (cont.). Links to further examples of this behavior have been posted today by Lisciotto's alter ego "Herodotus2010.rodoh" in his RODOH posts 74 and 75. Thanks for helping me make my point, Mr. Lisciotto!

As to what jnovitz/lgr calls a "prolonged campaign of internet vilification against these two sites and their owners", I repeat what I told Lisciotto, in response to one of the boringly repetitive smear posts he has lately filled the RODOH forum's "Siberian Exile" section with, in my post 12122:

The poor fellow keeps repeating the "vehemently hate www.holocaustresearchproject.org" and "conspiratorial concerted effort" nonsense, thereby confiming my characterization of him as a paranoid monomaniac.

Actually the articles collected here were the work of Sergey Romanov alone, and as anyone reading them will recognize they were related to the less-than-commendable behavior of H.E.A.R.T.'s founding fathers. A period of two and a half years between the series of articles starting on 30.10.2006 and ending on 14.04.2007 on the one hand and the article of 20.11.2009 on the other furthermore suggests that H.E.A.R.T. isn't exactly one of the author's priorities. Get a life, Mr. L.

The RODOH thread in which I wrote the above also contains my posts 12126 and 12127, in which I called Lisciotto's attention to the problems that the http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/ and http://www.deathcamps.org// sites were having. Regarding the latter I asked Lisciotto to try and fix those problems quickly:

As ARC is still a good site (thanks to great researcher Webb's exceptionally wise decision to freeze it after he had appropriated it instead of ruining it with "Andy Schmidt" fakes), that is really a shame.

I would therefore appreciate if you could contact Google and fix the problem asap, Mr. L. Thanks in advance!

No irony there, as I sometimes link to http://www.deathcamps.org// now that http://www.death-camps.org/ (the mirror site that used to be maintained by other former members of the ARC research group after Webb appropriated the original site) is no longer online. I last did so in my blog Belzec Mass Graves and Archaeology - Continuation (2), IIRC. Maybe jnovitz/lgr can explain why I should have tried to damage a site that I use as a source, if I had the manipulative inclinations he is obviously projecting onto me plus the computer skills required to bring about such infection. Actually my abilities in this respect do not go beyond using standard programs from a user perspective. I don't know if any of my "associates" (jnovitz/lgr must be referring to my fellow HC bloggers) has such skills, but my ability to judge a person’s character would be a very bad one if any of them descended to the level of Lisciotto-style manipulations.

Differences in ideology aside (jnovitz/lgr is a Holocaust denier of a particularly lunatic variety that even denies the existence of crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau and other camps, whereas Lisciotto is what Sergey has called a Holocaust fanatic), the two loonies get along as well as becomes birds of a feather, by the way. At least this is suggested by lgr’s amusing doublethink/doublespeak exercise in his post 2859, where he precedes another repetition of his manipulation insinuations discussed above with the following cynical remark:

Mr Herodotus, I found your Alexa rankings extremely informative. Would you be able to pass on my congratulations to the HEART team from me? I see them as adversaries, but I can always appreciate an opponent that fights fair.

Like the equally narcissistic Lisciotto, jnovitz/lgr obviously projecting his own pathological concerns onto me when assuming that I would be worried about or angered by H.E.A.R.T. having far more visitors than HC. Needless to say, his babbling about my "little intellectual integrity" and "unscrupulous nature" is another exercise of self-projection.

The next bitching fish-wife on the CODOH thread Dear Andrea Merkel: How much do Raul Hilberg and I owe you?, who calls himself "Karl Radl", will be dealt with in my next blog.

More smear & bitching on CODOH (Part 2)

Update on the mentally unbalanced HSRDB freak ...

I'm glad to see that I still figure prominently in the poor creature's nightmares, judging by the latest update of his smear site [screenshot 1] [screenshot 2] (screenshots of an earlier version see here).

And he's stupid enough to out himself as the author of this smear site, as this screenshot shows.

Update, 20.04.2010 17:51 GMT: The freak sent mail.

The account reactivation issue ...

... has been settled the way of Jonnie "Hannover" Hargis, by converting an expired temporary ban into a permanent ban. See my RODOH post 11987, which also features another of Hargis' mendacious "Muehlenkamp got demolished" victory dances and the following manifestation of gratitude by Drew J:

Always ready with the old topic references. I love it. I have only read about the coke and the hosing of the chambers. Now I have more to read. Thanks Hannover. Always there for us.

"Always there for us". Touching, isn't it?

The mentally unbalanced HSRDB freak ...

... is obviously trying to smear me by posting crap on a website he created with my name [ screenshot page 1, screenshot page 2]. He is offering this "top website" ("over 2,300 hits recorded in 21 days") for sale to the highest bidder on E-Bay, or so he proclaims. Oh, the imbecility.

Not that I'm worried about this, on the contrary. Such criminal activities are further proof that "Revisionism" appeals to rather sick minds, and thus another shot in the foot of "Revisionism".

Meanwhile, on the "CODOH Revisionist Forum" ...

... my old friend Drew J (who obviously knows that my CODOH account has not yet been reactivated, for he refers to the previous blog and thereby signals that he's interested in what we write here) is again mouthing off about me, thereby displaying a miserable personality and (as he claims to have bested me here and there) his delusions of adequacy.



In his post of Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:09 am, Drew J spins silly
conjectures about Goebbels' diaries not being authentic. The only "indication" he can offer is that in a certain diary entry I mentioned (which was brought to my attention by Drew J's fellow believer "Thomas Dalton" via a lower-ranking rambler who calls himself Ralph Gordon, see my RODOH post 11943) Goebbels shows no compunction to write about death and executions, as I pointed out. For Drew J this suggests that Goebbels' diaries are not authentic. Why Goebbels should not have called things by their proper names in his own private diary entry - a document not meant for public disclosure - Drew J doesn't explain, instead turning to imbecilic "Robert knows deep down inside but will never admit it" - accusations and babbling that "There seems to be no good reason to think those are authentic Goebbels diaries.". That the diary entries fit the historical context in which they were written in a manner suggesting contemporary insider knowledge (for instance, the diary entry of 27.03.1942 was written ten days after the start of deportations from Lublin to Belzec extermination camp and mentions the head of Aktion Reinhard(t), Odilo Globocnik, as "the former Gauleiter of Vienna"), that they were never used for propaganda purposes (one doesn't make forgeries to keep them in the drawer) but gradually became known as historians analyzed them and realized their significance, that neither historians nor criminal justice authorities referring to these diary entries (the entry of 27 March 1942 is mentioned, for instance, in the judgment at the Sobibor trial in Hagen in 1966) have found any reason to doubt the authenticity of these diaries (that includes erstwhile "Revisionist" favorite David Irving, who pointed out that he had personally been in Moscow and examined the originals of the diaries), plus his own inability to point out indications of forgery (Goebbels' having written about deaths and executions is none) - all this is no "good reason" for Drew J to "think those are authentic Goebbels diaries". His lack of arguments makes his forgery claims look increasingly desperate.

What is especially funny is that, while on the one hand "Revisionists" like "Dalton" and Gordon are pathetically trying to explain away the incriminating content of Goebbels' diaries, including but not limited to the one of 27 March 1942, other followers of the "Revisionist" creed such as Drew J are yelling "forgery" and thereby confirming that they consider Goebbels diary entries to have incriminating contents incompatible with their articles of faith. For if they didn't consider these diary entries to have incriminating contents, why would they be claiming that they are not authentic? A discussion between the two schools of "Revisionist" nonsense ("Dalton"/Gordon vs. Drew J/Heink) should be most amusing to watch.

The one good thing about Drew J is that he still seems to disagree with the cowardly disfigurement of links to the RODOH forum, which like other CODOH practices speaks volumes about the hypocrisy of their claim to "open debate". Drew J wrote:

Sorry but I have not reproduced hyperlinks here as codoh will not allow rodoh links to go unsubstituted with the old 'aliceinwonderland' thing.

I wonder long will it take for Drew J to also swallow this "thing" and fully tow the party line.

Drew J's obsession with this writer furthermore shows in his post of Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:09 am, where he writes the following:

Let's talk about how Hoess was tortured and how other nazis were tortured to say things to fit the propaganda. I went over this many times with Roberto Muehlenkamp, but he refuses to acknowledge reality. He eventually budged but said Hoess wasn't tortured. Just MISHANDLED. Can you believe that?

Drew J's claim that he "went over this" with me is funny insofar as the discussion took place on two different forums (me writing on the RODOH forum, where Drew J wouldn't show up, he writing on the CODOH forum where I was not allowed to write). The "budged" crap shows Drew J's eagerness to convince himself that he gained the upper hand (he must be so desperate to have an experience of success that he claims them in the absence of any). As to the "tortured" vs. "mishandled" thing, I'd call that a false dilemma as it doesn't matter which of the two terms one uses for the treatment that Hoess received at the hand of his British captors, which Hoess himself described as follows in the memoirs he later wrote in Polish captivity (from the translation by Constantine FitzGibbon published by Phoenix Press under the title "Commandant of Auschwitz", pages 173f.):

I was arrested on 11 March, 1946.
My phial of poison had been broken two days before.
When I was aroused from sleep, I thought at first I was being attacked by robbers, for many robberies were taking place at that time. That was how they managed to arrest me. I was maltreated by the Field Security Police.
I was taken to Heide where I was put in those very barracks from which I had been released by the British eight months earlier.
At my first interrogation, evidence was obtained by beating me. I do not know what is in the record, although I signed it. Alcohol and the whip were too much for me. The whip was my own, which by chance had got into my wife’s luggage. It had hardly ever touched my horse, far less the prisoners. Nevertheless, one of my interrogators was convinced that I had perpetually used it for flogging the prisoners.
After some days I was taken to Minden-on-the-Weser, the main interrogation center in the British Zone. There I received further rough treatment at the hands of the English public prosecutor, a major.

What matters, as I remember having pointed out to Drew J as we "went over this", was that Hoess stated nothing under the influence of this mishandling or torture (whichever term is Drew J's preference) that he didn't state, even in more detail, on later occasions when he was far removed from the influence of physical violence, namely in his testimony for the defence of Kaltenbrunner before the IMT and in his writings in Polish captivity, including his notes under the title The Final Solution of the Jewish Question in Auschwitz. In the latter he even told his captors where they could stick their 4 million figure for the death toll of Auschwitz-Birkenau. From the translation in "Commandant of Auschwitz", pages 193 and following (emphasis added):

I myself never knew the total number and I have nothing to help me make an estimate of it.
I can only remember the figure involved in the larger actions, which were repeated to me by Eichmann or his deputies.
From Upper Silesia and Polish territory under German rule … 250,000
Germany and Theresienstadt … 100,000
Holland … 95,000
Belgium … 20,000
France … 110,000
Greece … 65,000
Hungary … 400,000
Slovakia … 90,000
I can no longer remember the figures for the smaller actions, but they were insignificant in comparison with the numbers given above.
I regard a total of two and a half millions [stated by Hoess earlier interrogations including his IMT deposition - RM] as far too high. Even Auschwitz had limits to its destructive possibilities.
Figures given by former prisoners are figments of the imagination and lack any foundation.

Those Poles must have been squeezing Hoess's balls like hell for him to write this.

The figures given by Hoess add up to 1,130,000.

The figure estimated by the Soviet investigation in 1945, on the basis of the theoretical capacity of the installations and the depositions of former captives, was 4,000,000. This figure was officially upheld by the Polish government until 1992.

What Hoess was doing here was to directly challenge the reliability of his captors’ other sources, of their and the Soviet investigation commissions and of the eyewitnesses on which these commissions had relied. The latter he attacked in the strongest terms, calling them "figments of the imagination".

Why would the Poles let Hoess get away with this, if they had been bent on dictating his statements?

Why, if "Revisionists" were to be believed, would they even have coerced him into producing these highly inconvenient, counterproductive statements?

Were they so boundlessly dumb as to induce Hoess into shooting them in the foot, into openly writing into his memoirs that their own estimates of the death toll of his camp were wildly exaggerated?

Or is the "Revisionist" contention that what Hoess wrote was dictated or "doctored" by his captors what Hoess himself would have called "figments of the imagination" lacking any foundation?

I'll leave my friend Drew J to wonder about this (once more). Let's see if he can come up with something better than simply ignoring these and other inconvenient statements of Hoess that render absurd the claim that everything the man said or wrote was extracted from him by torture, or lamely claiming that the above-quoted writings of Hoess are not authentic.

As you will be reading this, Drew J, can I ask you for a favor? Please remind the CODOH moderator of reactivating my account, so that we can continue our conversation on the CODOH forum. Thanks in advance!

Update, 10.03.2010:

See my RODOH posts nos 11981, 11982 and 11983.

Showpieces of "Revisionist" stupidity/mendacity ...

... are being discussed in the RODOH forum's thread Was Goebbels out of the Extermination loop?, where "Thomas Dalton" is being quoted by his fellow "Revisionist" Ralph Gordon. See my posts nos. 11943, 11945 and 11949.

Hi there, Mr. CODOH Forum Moderator

Could you please reactivate my account?

Ban period is over.

Update, 21.02.2010 13:51 hours GMT: Still waiting for reactivation.

Update, 22.02.2010 08:20 hours GMT: Still waiting for reactivation.

Update, 22.02.2010 23:17 hours GMT: Still waiting for reactivation. What's the matter?

Update, 23.02.2010 23:53 hours GMT: Still waiting for reactivation. Are they afraid of me?

Update, 27.02.2010 12:46 hours GMT: Still waiting for reactivation. It seems they are afraid of me indeed.

Update, 07.03.2010 11:22 hours GMT: Still waiting for reactivation. Meanwhile, on the "CODOH Revisionist forum ...

Mr. Gerdes drives another nail into the "Revisionist" coffin

On the "CODOH Revisionist Forum" (where my account has not yet been reactivated even though the one-month period of the ban decreed on 19.01.2010 has already expired; I have sent an e-mail to the moderator requesting reactivation), my old friend Greg Gerdes accomplished something extraordinary for his low intellect and character.



After again repeating his simian "locate/prove the existence of just one mass grave containing 1/xth of y% of the alleged mass murder at z extermination camp" - hollering (see here and here), and having apparently realized that his fellow true believers didn't give a fuck anymore about this nonsense (last commented by me here), he opened a thread called jews, Transit Camps and the Soviet Gulag. On this thread, after briefly repeating his mendacious "not so much as one single grave [snip blah, blah, blah]" - mantra, he tried to provide evidence (yes, believe it or not: Gerdes tried to provide evidence!) that the Jews deported to "the fraudulently alleged 'pure extermination centers'", which "were in fact transit camps" (i.e. the at least about 1,517,500 Jews deported to Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka, thereof ca. 152,000 to Chelmno, 434,500 to Belzec, 150,000 to Sobibor and 781,000 to Treblinka, see my RODOH post # 11878) ended up in the Soviet Gulag and perished there.

Considering Greg Gerdes'private standards of evidence as concerns Nazi crimes, which obviously require not only physically locating and establishing the dimensions of the mass graves and the quality of their contents (that has been done by archaeological investigation regarding all aforementioned camps except Treblinka, where Polish criminal investigators found a large area covered by human remains and established the depth of at least one mass grave, but did not determine the precise location and dimensions of each grave - see my RODOH post # 11879), but also physically locating and quantifying the human remains contained in each grave, one would expect the evidence for Gerdes' "The real jewish holocaust - by Soviet Gulag" - case to consist wholly or mainly of physical evidence to the burial of enormous numbers of Jewish bodies at the site of former Gulag camp complexes like Kolyma and Vorkuta.

What we get instead is this:

I would like to present, as exhibit # 1 for this thread - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's book - The Gulag Archipelago. If you haven't read this book yet, you don't know the holohoax. It will give you answers for things that you didn't even know there were questions about.

And for exhibit # 2, I give you:


Surviving the Camps but Struggling in Brooklyn

New York Times, January 21, 2010

By JENNIFER MASCIA


Ruth Usherenko keeps an improbably thick book on a table beside the couch in her living room. In it are roughly 58,000 names, all belonging to Jewish Berliners who perished during Hitler's regime. "All my girlfriends, all my relatives, all my neighbors are in here,"

...Beside her sat her sister, Toni Usherenko, 85, equally diminutive and delicate, who spoke in the same halting hybrid of Russian and English. The two live a block apart in Brighton Beach, Brooklyn, maintaining a closeness forged during World War II and later in a Siberian prison camp...

The sisters spent their early years in Neustrelitz, a town in northern Germany. After their father, a tailor, became a target of Nazi intimidation, the family moved to Berlin...

The girls' father was badly beaten in the riot, suffering a heart attack and a damaged kidney. Three years later, he was taken to Sachsenhausen concentration camp, where he perished.

Weeks after their father was apprehended, Ruth, Toni and their mother were taken to Gross-Rosen , a work camp...

In 1945, the three women were sent by the Soviets to a labor camp in Siberia; they were considered suspect because of their religion and their German provenance.

"We couldn't speak one word of Russian," Ruth Usherenko recalled. "They didn't feed us. When people died, they didn't bury them — they put them in the forest and the wolves were eating them."

So complete was their isolation that they did not know when the war ended. "Stalin passed away in 1953, and they released us in 1955," Ruth Usherenko recalled. "A woman came to us and said, `The war is over.' "

The three women settled in the Ukrainian town of Dnepropetrovsk, where they worked as milliners. The sisters married — Ruth to a shoemaker and Toni to an aviation engineer — and in 1981, after years of trying to leave the Soviet Union, the families were able to emigrate to Brooklyn...

But having money for heat is most important to Ms. Usherenko, perhaps because the cold is a reminder of the frigid decade she spent in Siberia. "They put us in a cold school, no steam," she recounted. "We had one blanket for me, my mother and my sister. Everybody died."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/nyreg ... mps&st=cse

Having read Solshenizyn's The Gulag Archipelago myself, I don't remember having found much there about Jewish victims of Stalinist violence. One or the other individual whose name is mentioned in the book may be Jewish, the purge against Jewish doctors, artists and intellectuals of the late Stalin era is addressed, and that's it, IIRC. But let's give Gerdes the benefit of doubt and assume that he presented Solshenizyn's book only as evidence of the existence and operation of the Soviet Gulag camps. For this purpose I can accept his "exhibit 1", even though Gerdes nowhere explains why memoirs of a not exactly impartial Soviet dissident should be better proof of the Gulag than the research and investigation results of historians and mostly German criminal investigators, who discovered, cross-checked and evaluated a large body of eyewitness, documentary and physical evidence, including but not limited to what is quoted or referred to in my aforementioned RODOH posts, is proof of the mass murder at the Nazi extermination camps. I assume that proof of the death of over 1.5 million Jewish deportees in the Soviet Gulag, the existence of which Gerdes considers proven by his "exhibit # 1", is supposed to be contained in "exhibit # 2".

"Exhibit # 2" is an article in the New York Times about two elderly Jewish sisters living in Brooklyn, Ruth and Toni Usherenko, who during World War II were deported by the Nazis to Gross-Rosen concentration camp in Poland. When Soviet troops overran this camp in 1945, the two ladies and their mother were "considered suspect because of their religion and their German provenance", and eventually sent to a labor camp in Siberia, from where they were only released in 1955, two years after Stalin's death. Then they lived in the Soviet Union until 1981 before emigrating to the United States.

I'd say that presenting this as evidence that the Jews deported to Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka "transit camps" (for whose transportation to the Nazi-occupied Soviet territories or to labor camps in Poland there is not a shred of evidence in the first place, even though there would be a huge paper trail and thousands upon thousands of eyewitnesses if either or both had occurred) is further evidence, arguably some of the best evidence yet, that Greg Gerdes has as much brain matter as is suggested by his aspect. For apart from displaying his flagrant double standards in the dumbest manner, and from idiotically insinuating that one can derive conclusions about the fate of at least over 1.5 million people from the story of just two individuals, he apparently didn't notice that neither of the two old ladies was deported to any of the extermination camps Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka. Neither were they deported to any of the dual purpose camps Auschwitz-Birkenau and Majdanek, which served both as concentration camps and as extermination camps. No, they were deported to Gross Rosen, a plain concentration camp. Many of the inmates of that camp were not Jewish, and of the about 120,000 prisoners who passed through the Gross-Rosen camp system, "only" 40,000 died either in Gross-Rosen or during the evacuation of the camp. That was where the two key witnesses for Gerdes'case (it's also extraordinary that Gerdes all of a sudden accepts as evidence the testimony of eyewitnesses, moreover Jewish ones) spent the war. The never even got close to the places of mass murder that Gerdes calls "transit camps".

While I'm not surprised that someone as limited as Gerdes makes a fool of himself in such a pitiable manner, the hilariously silly claim that Gerdes "drives another nail into the Holocoffin" with his "evidence" was made not by Gerdes, but by a slightly more intelligent - though no less obnoxious - "Revisionist" from New Zealand, who posts on the RODOH forum as "little gray rabbit" (the alias he finally stuck with after having used at least half a dozen others). This gentleman posted Gerdes' above-quoted "exhibit # 2" in his RODOH thread Mr Gerdes drives another nail into the Holocoffin, followed by the cryptic remark "Any comment by me is superfluous". After his silliness was pointed out by Jonathan Harrison and Wahrheitseeker, and after his brother-in-spirit ralphgordon asked him what point he was trying to make, lgr tuned down his rhetoric and argued that this "exhibit" cast doubt on the accuracy of records of people murdered by the Nazis, in which he "expected" the sisters Ruth and Toni Usherenko to have at some time been or still be included:

Gerdes put it over at CODOH, its from the New York Times. The point is not particularly difficult, 3 alleged Holocaust victims were taken off to Siberia and then not allowed to leave Russia for 40 more years. I expect at some point they would have been included on a list of murdered by the Nazis - and perhaps they still are, as the article does not give their unmarried names.

Unfortunately for lgr, the Usherenko sisters had been residing in Germany before their deportation, and Germany is one of the countries that have a more or less complete record of the names and other personal data and of the individual fates of Jews living on their pre-war territory who fell victim to Nazi persecution and mass murder. Since 2007, an internet edition of the "Gedenkbuch – Opfer der Verfolgung der Juden unter der nationalsozialistischen Gewaltherrschaft in Deutschland 1933 – 1945" (Memorial Book - Victims of Persecution of the Jews under the National Socialist Rule of Violence in Germany 1933 - 1945) is available on the website of the German Federal Archives in Koblenz. This online database, which includes 159,972 names of Jews who had resided in Germany within its borders as of 31 December 1937, thereof about 155,000 murdered persons, made it possible to check whether lgr's insinuation was pertinent or just "Revisionist" wishful thinking. If Ruth and Toni Usherenko were mentioned in the Federal Archives' database as having fallen victim to Nazi persecution and mass murder, this would mean that said database cannot be necessarily relied upon and information from there should be cross-checked against other sources before using it. If, on the other hand, the two sisters' names were absent from the database, this would mean that they were not wrongly recorded as victims of Nazi persecution and mass murder, and thus speak for the reliability of the database.

The searches done by Dr. Neander and me (see Dr. Neander's posts nos. 562, 563, 564 and 565 and my post # 11919) revealed that Ruth and Toni Usherenko are nowhere mentioned in the Federal Archives'database. On the other hand, we managed to find the man who in all probability was the ladies' father, Nachim Usherenko. As Dr. Neander pointed out, N. Usherenko was a tailor in Berlin (just like the two sisters' father), who lived in the city between 1936 and 1941; he was the only man by that name recorded in the Berlin address book. The sisters' father was a tailor who moved to Berlin some time after the Nazis came to power, according to the NYT article. Nachim Usherenko was deported to Sachsenhausen and perished there, just like the sisters' father. The chances that Nachim Usherenko was not the father of Ruth and Toni Usherenko are thus rather remote.

So thanks to Gerdes' and lgr's attempt to drive "another nail into the Holocoffin", Dr. Neander and I found out that Nachim Usherenko succumbed to Nazi violence and is accordingly recorded in the Federal Archives' database, that his daughters Ruth and Toni survived Nazi violence and are not recorded in this database of Jews from Germany murdered by the Nazis, and that it can therefore be assumed that the Federal Archives did a proper job and recorded as Jews from Germany murdered by the Nazis only Jews from Germany actually murdered by the Nazis. Another puerile attempt to vindicate "Revisionist" nonsense was another glorious shot in the "Revisionist" foot - or, to paraphrase lgr's expression, another nail in the "Revisionist" coffin.

The Federal Archives' database (click the icon "Namensverzeichnis" at bottom of page, which leads to this mask, check the field "Deportationsort", insert the name of the camp after "Suchen nach" and click the icon "Suche starten" at the bottom of the mask) contains, among others, the names of Jews from Germany deported to Chelmno (2,570 names), Belzec (290 names), Sobibor (5,689 names; regarding some deportees it is uncertain whether the final destination was Sobibor or Majdanek) and Treblinka (7,800 names). If Mr. Gerdes can prove that any of these people ended up in the Soviet Gulag, I'll send him a big box of bananas.

PS, 23.02.2010, 11:05 hours GMT:

Mr. Gerdes seems to have worn out his welcome on CODOH indeed, or then at least one of his fellow "Revisionists" has grown understandably tired of Gerdes' repetitive remixes of the same stupid song. On his thread New NAFH challenge/reward offer, Gerdes' imbecilic rhetorical question:

Would you say that the hoaxers utter silence proves that there are no human remains in fraudulently alleged Sobibor "huge mass grave" #7/45?

received the following reply from "Lamprecht" (which of course caused Gerdes to freak out and give Lamprecht the "show me just one this and that" - treatment):

Their utter silence proves that they don't care about what you have to say, and pretending that they're ignoring you for the sole reason that they can't answer your questions is dishonest and sophomoric.

Apart from the "sole" thing ("hoaxers" can answer all of Gerdes' questions to the extent they are pertinent and relevant and not just hollow rhetorical bluster, which however applies to only a minority of said questions at best, and this particular "hoaxer" has answered Gerdian questions many times before whereas Gerdes left hundreds of my questions unanwered), Lamprecht is right. We don't care about Gerdes' hysterical, moronic hollering. However, this writer likes to occasionally use Gerdes' tirades as an opportunity to a) present evidence inconvenient to "Revisionist" articles of faith, most of which Gerdes prefers to ignore, and b) use Gerdes as a splendid demonstration object of "Revisionist" ... well, ill-reasoning, to put it politely. And I intend to do so on the "CODOH Revisionist Forum", to the extent that the moderator should permit it. I hope my account has been activated since yesterday evening.

HSRDB.com libels Roberto and me

As of now we can see this disclaimer on that site [screenshot]:

On the 18th February, this site was suspended due to threats by Holocaust fanatics.

This site will be re-launched on 22nd February 2010 and will no longer be hosting databases associated with the Holocaust or World War Two until further notice. We are currently accepting requests for databases related to significant historical events that occurred during World War One.

Have a suggestion?

We would like to take the opportunity to thank all contributors to the project to date.

Why did this happen?

Two Holocaust fanatics, Mr. Roberto Muehlenkamp and Mr.Sergy Romanov have apparently been attempting to derail this project by fraudulently claiming that it is a Holocaust denial website.

They have never been associated with, nor contributed to this project. They have based their criticisms on the contributions of others and ignored the stated goals of this project. Sensitive information and photographs were obtained by hacking a private Gmail account belonging to a web-designer who was attempting to generate interest I the project. This information was subsequently used to threaten our contributors and my family personally.

It is a shame that certain elements within society resort to such tactics to achieve their ends, destroying the good work of other in the process.

As a side note, it's interesting how these claims mirror the claims of another mentally unbalanced person - Carmelo Lisciotto (of holocaustresearchproject.org) - who through a series of fake blogs tries to spread rumors that me and Nick hacked deathcamps.org because apparently we're closet Holocaust deniers (for the real story behind deathcamps.org demise click here). All these internet loons have poor fantasy and a single old playbook, just changing the sign as necessary (Holocaust deniers/Holocaust fanatics).

Anyway, no, nobody of us had any relation to the alleged hacking of any email, and we doubt that any email was hacked in the first place (this is a mere unfounded claim by a person who lies as he breathes). But yes, information about the person behind that site was obtained after he legally threatened the members of RODOH and RODOH itself for something he didn't like (i.e. people calling him an antisemite). We don't like frivolous legal threats coming from semi-anonymous a-holes, so we decided to take a look at what Google had in store. Tracking down the owner's information was ridiculously easy since he was very stupid by sharing it with everybody.

1. His Facebook page had publicly accessible photos of him and his family, though under an assumed surname (which he had used at RODOH and elsewhere).

2. He tested the first version of HRSDB on the site he created for his son (what kind of person does that?). Although he deleted it, the Google cache still shows numerous traces even as I write this text (Google cache is temporary, but it lasts for some time; in any case we've taken screenshots).

3. The public domain name registration records of various sites confirmed his identity.

So after numerous legal threats issued by this person right and left, and after he created a libelous website about Roberto with the threat of exposing "everything" about Roberto and his private life ("You see, as you are obviously such a special person, the world really should know EVERYTHING there is to know about you, your views and your personal life. I intend to go DEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP buddy. Real deep."), I suggested to him that I might also expose this collected information, especially to the local police of the city he now resides in the country where Holocaust denial and antisemitic propaganda are illegal.

That was the extent of the "threats" mentioned in the disclaimer. So Richard is just being hypocritical.

As to the claims about that website being fraudulent, see this article by Jonathan and decide for yourself.

Another mind that "Revisionism" attracts

The self-projecting sociopath who hopes to work wonders for "Revisionism" with the database he is putting together under http://www.hsrdb.com ("Just wait until this new database that cross-references ALL the witness testimonies about these topics in one report goes online - the gross inconsistencies will be exposed once and for all."; screenshot) has reacted to my previous blog in a manner that is hardly surprising.



First he freaked out, as becomes his pathological state of mind.

Then, after expanding the website he created for bitching about me (screenshot of what it looked like yesterday at 14:19 hours GMT, prior to said expansion), he decided to put it up "for sale" (screenshot taken on 19.02.2009 at 11:40 hours GMT), giving the address "me@RobertoMuehlenkamp.com" for "direct inquiries".

This madman, who like others of his kind is attracted to "Revisionist" madness, has been active on the web under two names, Richard L. and Richard A. The former is the name under which he registered the website http://www.hsrdb.com. The latter is a "dummy name" used "by our contributors to enter forums", according to a message on the RODOH forum in which our friend, besides spouting other confused nonsense, accuses me or my "associate" of having hacked his e-mail account and "accessed personal and sensitive emails" (I don't know who my "associate" could be, and I couldn't hack anything even if were to try, because my computer skills don't go beyond handling a PC from a user's perspective). Both names are probably pseudonyms, so I'll simply call the fellow by the name "Richard", under which he posted on this blogspot. Richard apparently lives in Prague, as Sergey found out along with other information.

Richard's fits of hysteria concerning me started when I posted this message on the RODOH forum:

Your posts are way too long for their meager content, Mr. Just The Truth * (Posters are not to refer to fellow posters as by anything but their real names unless given permission to do otherwise. NKVD) .

Try providing some evidence that would support your "transit camp" claim. If hundreds of thousands of people had been transported from Treblinka "transit camp" to the "Russian East", you would have a huge paper trail and thousands upon thousands of eyewitnesses to choose from.

In the original version of this message, edited by the moderator, I had addressed Richard not by his forum handle "JustTheTruth", but by a misspelled version of what I thought was his surname, which I remembered having seen somewhere on the RODOH board (I haven't found the respective post since; it may have been deleted to accommodate Richard's proclaimed anonymity concerns). As Richard informed the board in his above-mentioned later message, that name is a "dummy name". So what made him freak out was probably not his privacy paranoia but my reference to an unsolvable "Revisionist" dilemma (the absence of any evidence suggesting deportation from Treblinka extermination camp to the Nazi-occupied Soviet territories, even though such evidence should be plentiful if such deportations had taken place) plus my criticism of his posts being "too long for their meager content" (the latter may have been predominant in triggering his rage, considering that sociopaths tend to have a "grandiose sense of self" and be "outraged by insignificant matters"). This adds a touch of characteristic mendacity to the fellow's furious yelling in several posts of equal content on the RODOH forum (here, here, here and here). I responded to this yelling in my posts nos. 11907 and 11908.

Meanwhile, Richard had also found my e-mail address, presumably in my blog profile, and started sending silly threats and accusations and other hysterical nonsense my way. These e-mail messages, as announced in my previous blog (the bitching website is still in place, even though its content is currently not visible, and Richard is using an e-mail address with my name in it) shall be transcribed hereafter, also in order to complete Richard's pathology profile as currently known, and for the amusement value of some of his utterances (his "success story" bragging I find especially funny, and his having "sat up for three hours deciding how to respond" to my "terrorism" made me laugh out loud). I also transcribe my replies to these mails. Any further comments are unnecessary, as our friend brilliantly condemns himself through his own words. I have made Richard's gmail-surname unrecognizable, even though it is a dummy according to Richard, lest any decent citizen bearing the same surname be associated with this individual.

You gutless sociopath!
...
Tue, February 16, 2010 11:08:39 AM
From:
Richard Axxxx
...
View Contact
To: cortagravatas@yahoo.com

Roberto, I really appreciate your "exposing" me on the RODOH forum and
publishing my name in an attempt to intimidate me, you cowardly fuck. I
think you might realize soon that this was a serious error in judgement on
you part and will not be something you do again in a hurry.

But *how fucking dare you?*

Who the fuck do you think you are to play a game with my life?

You might be some self-appointed nazi-hater dipstick and believe you are an
some sort of mission - but to the outside world you are just a deranged and
unhinged fuckhead with no common decency whatsoever.

Obviously you want to play with me, so lets play Roberto.

I am now going to turn MY attention to YOU and doing a little "exposing" of
my own.

I notice you work for Siemens as a "Contract Manager" - you really are a
big-time being an EMPLOYEE and must be pulling down the big bucks - lol
Lets hope you are really secure in your job, it might be a shame to be
looking for new employment during a global recession. Of course having
retired at 42, I have no such worries.

Well lets also hope that Siemens don't mind being associated with an
employee that will be soon gaining a very prominent profile across the
internet for all the wrong reasons.

Presumably, you have the support of your employer for your extra-curricular
activities? You will soon be needing it let me assure you.

I hope you will enjoy what I have planned for you Roberto. I sat up for
three hours deciding how to respond to your terrorism and decided that
fuckers like you rarely understand anything but direct action - so that is
what you are getting. 100%

So I just registered www.RobertMuehlenkam.com and have ordered an nice new
website to be constructed, just in your honor Roberto.

You see, as you are obviously such a special person, the world really should
know EVERYTHING there is to know about you, your views and your personal
life. I intend to go DEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP buddy. Real deep.

To make sure the site comes up as in the first page of

Re: You gutless sociopath!
...
Tue, February 16, 2010 2:24:36 PM
From:
Guadalupe Salcedo [Chat now]
...
View Contact
To: Richard Axxxx
Hi Mr. Axxxx,

While I had no intention to "expose" you when addressing you by your last name (which I though was "Axxxx" after reading it in an e-mail message of yours somewhere on the RODOH board, sorry for the mistake), I cannot help laughing at your hysterical reaction and the silly threats you're sending my way.

So you want to "expose" me to my employers. Just go ahead, you'll be telling them nothing they don't know already, and it doesn't look like they have a problem with one of their employees fighting Holocaust denial in his spare time, which may even be considered an act of social responsibility. If I were a Holocaust denier they would pull my ears, but I would also have no problem with your trying to defame me in this sense, as I can easily prove that I'm on the side of the good guys. If you bother my employers with your story, they will probably tell you that they don't mind my activities as long as they don't interfere with my work productivity, as a former hierarchical superior told me once in the same context. And if you pester them too much, they will probably send their legal advisers your way.

So you want to open a website to bitch around about me? Just go ahead, you'll only be increasing my ratings and showing everybody that you are a mentally unbalanced person desperately in need of psychiatric assistance. I'll look in and have a laugh about your nonsense every once in a while, on the HC blog or wherever else I consider appropriate.

You want to "bury" into my personal life? There's nothing to hide there, so whoever you want to "expose" me to will get bored pretty soon. Unless you want to indulge in libel and defamation, that is. If this should be your intention, I trust you will at least be man enough to send me your address so I can take the proper legal steps against such activity.

That said, I would like to give you some friendly advice: go see a psychiatrist. From what your writings have revealed and what I little know about psychiatry, I'd say you suffer from a serious case of schizophrenia, with what I think is called egomania (everything revolves around you) and paranoia (everybody is after you and wants to do you some harm) as the outstanding symptoms. For your own sake and for the sake of your environment, you should do something about your malady. And rest assured that I'll be glad to hear of your therapeutic progress.

With my best regards,

Roberto Muehlenkamp

Re: You gutless sociopath!
...
Tue, February 16, 2010 5:00:41 PM
From:
Richard Axxxx
...
View Contact
To: Guadalupe Salcedo
We will see who is laughing shortly, wheels are in motion buddy...

"While I had no intention to "expose" you when addressing you by your last name..." Pull the other one you lying sack of shit - you clearly had the intention to "expose" me or the silly fucking thought of using my name would never have occurred to you. As my friend commented today - "what sort of sick individual would do something like that?" - Answer is YOU!

Go look at your ugly face in the mirror and see for yourself.

The methods you employ to debase arguments are patently transparent to even the casual observer.

I simply tried to generate some debate but you and your ilk have no time for others opinions if they don't agree with yours, despite the stated purpose of the forum. You are the very fucking definition of intolerance which is the very Shiite that is preached by church of the true "believers" - ie. dips like you that have no objectivity whatsoever; so you decided to "out" me.

Please explain your thought process that lead you to deciding to post my name? What exactly was you motivation? Where was your provocation?

Now you have the affront to threaten legal action on the basis that I might post some "opinions" about you online, when you are your other "special" friend Sergy were happy to defame me by calling me an anti-semite and using my name. This is called defamation here in the UK where we have some of the best legislation in the world.

So if this is the path you would like to follow, I am more than willing. You better realize that this is no idle threat and WILL actually involve you spending real money once the process starts.

I assume you will be divulging your real name and contact details and your Solicitor's (if you actually have one) so we can get started within 48 hours?

I am course am more than happy to give you full details and will instruct my Solicitor to make contact with yours. But I will wager that you will ignore this as your threats are as valid as your advice - you are a therapist now I see...


What you don't really seem to grasp is that I DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOU OR JEWS OR REVISIONISTS OR THE HOLOCAUST. FULL STOP!

I do however care about my reputation and will defend it at all costs.

I also care about TRUTH IN HISTORY unlike you and your "you agree with us - or you are against us" dipsticks that want the rest of us to believe whatever you conclude with questions. Sorry but I want my kids to engage in real debate not be force-fed by the self-appointed high-priests of history like you.

What is your actual link to this debate - are you Jewish by any chance?

GET OVER YOURSELF - YOU ARE A NOBODY and most people could not give a flying fuck about the bile your spout or your opinions.

You are a deluded sociopath, plain and simple.

I, on the other hand am a retired (at 42) entrepreneur who is financially secure, own a property portfolio and have investments that generate more than enough for me to never work another day in my life maintaining a lifestyle that makes losers like you bitter. I have have patents registered for two of my inventions that earn me substantial royalties annually, have had 4 highly successful businesses and employed 213 people in the course of my life; making two of them rich enough to also retire before 50.

I studied psychology in my spare time in order to help people in need and worked for a year for a charity for nominal wage to give something back to my community. I am now supporting a not-for-profit historical research project that is aimed at HELPING people learn history in a new way; not only with my time, but financially as well. Five years ago I founded a charity that recycles obsolete computer equipment and software from Australian businesses for free distribution to orphanages in Nairobi with the aim to assist children to learn valuable new skills. To date we have delivered over 13,000 IT components to twelve different community projects.

In other words, I am a success story - a contributing member of society. Your "opinions" therefore are rendered invalid by the facts, which is why I suspect you have launched such an attack - because people like you are scared of objective people like me as we often expose your "opinions" as bullshit by the very nature of our approach, Just the Truth!

So you call us anti-semite. Fuck you, the horse you rode in on and Chana the liar too!

So what the hell have you ever done, other that post your pathetic opinions on FEEE FORUMS?

I mean you believe in your cause so much you cant even invest in your own website like a typical freeloader!

I have checked you out and so far - a big fat NOTHING!

A mouthpiece is all you will be remembered as.

So I will be waiting for your Solicitor's details then...

Re: You gutless sociopath!
...
Tue, February 16, 2010 5:38:50 PM
From:
Richard Axxxx
...
View Contact
To: Guadalupe Salcedo
Roberto

As a side issue, I guess it was just coincidence that my gmail account got hacked at the same time was it?

Pull the other one!

The Met Police in London were notified this morning as this is a criminal offense in the UK and were supplied with your IP address (isn't technology great) as you are the only suspect.

As a direct consequence of this unauthorized access, my entire project team had to implement new security measures which are expected to cost in the vicinity of £2500 and our project manager suggests you were at the very least "recklessly indifferent" by your actions and wants to pursue you for costs.

I guess you wont be remaining anonymous for long...

I am still waiting for your Solicitor's details....

Re: You gutless sociopath!
...
Tue, February 16, 2010 5:56:51 PM
From:
Guadalupe Salcedo [Chat now]
...
View Contact
To: Richard Axxxx
Project team? I thought you had retired.

I'll let you into a little secret, Mr. Axxxx.

I couldn't hack anything even if I tried. I'm not too bad at handling a PC from a user's perspective, but that sums up my computer skills.

If you have money to waste on pointless legal actions, just go and throw it out of the window. It's your problem, not mine.

And I suggest you stop sending me these ridiculous threatening e-mails. I think that's called harrassment and would entitle me to take legal steps against you.

Cheers,
Roberto

Re: You gutless sociopath!
...
Tue, February 16, 2010 6:15:45 PM
From:
Richard Axxxx
...
View Contact
To: Guadalupe Salcedo
Hey Roberto, check out the new website updates...

Nice to finally talk to you personally and I am glad you are taking this as a joke! After all you are one of the self-appointed "good-guys" - a super-hero masquerading as a regular guy. More people in your position should have your unique sense of humor.

So I am able to update your BIO, do you have any non-Jewish causes you support?

Also, for the record, how did you become involved in debating Holocaust revisionists?
I have seen some suggestions online, but I would rather hear it directly from you - wouldn't want any stray "opinions" on your very own website would we?

Latest news is that tomorrow we will have the blog and guestbook up on the site - how exciting for you. We can even run opinion polls!

Looking forward to your feedback.


Best regards

Richard

Re: You gutless sociopath!
...
Tue, February 16, 2010 7:14:46 PM
From:
Richard Axxxx
...
View Contact
To: Guadalupe Salcedo
Roberto,

You were the one threatening legal action I simply accepted.

You have, as I suspected been blowing more hot air around with no intention of carrying through; but I warn you, that wont deter me from my new project.

However I am a reasonable man so any time you feel like offering me a sincere apology and providing the assurance that you and your dipstick buddy will never again attempt to defame or insult me publicly me in future, I will quite happily get back to my project and have nothing further to do with you.

I might even give you this website as a gift, you never know...

And by the way, I donate my time to a project that I believe is worthwhile as I want to give something back to society as a WHOLE and no longer want the pressures of being involved in a commercial enterprise. If you and your "believer" dips could over yourselves, you might actually see that a project like the one I am contributing to could be a great asset to you - after all the Holocaust did happen didn't it, so what are you so afraid of?

Have you ever stopped to consider that the way you act makes reasonable people think you have something to hide or you have no real faith in your beliefs - just obsession. As things stand for now however your side has had nothing but negativity and insults to offer, ZERO contributions but lots of paranoid inferences. Nice work as the revisionist have already been contributing and have requested 3 new databases. You morons even used this as a basis for claiming it was a revisionist site; even going so far as to infer that the statements at the bottom of EVERY page were some sort of ruse to fool you (like anyone really gives a shit about a bunch of circle-jerkers and fooling them - most people take statements like that at face value as expected), and if we called another site TreblinkaTransitCamp.com instead of DeathCamp like we DID, we would have to JUSTIFY this. To whom exactly? The RODOH members?

What planet are you people on?

If we were "revisionists" we would redirect the DeathCamp to TransitCamp and explain why the death camp stuff is all bullshit - only we are NOT.

Do yourself a favor and actually read the info on the websites and my posts about the project you might finally grasp what we are trying to achieve and why Treblinka was chosen as a test database and site. No conspiracy, just clever PR by starting with a controversial topic and stimulating debate to generate interest in the project with negligible costs.

But then we never expected to encounter a forum like RODOH or people like you or your buddy Sergy.

Just so you know we were advised today that it wold take one communication from our Solicitors to yuku.com to have the RODOH forum removed from their servers immediately and probably for good. However they responded promptly and acted in good faith to remedy the situation so we saw no point in taking it further.

Would have been a great score for us if we were really revisionists and anti-semites wouldn't it?

It is also rather interesting that this (the project) was the only part of my message you focused upon - and reminiscent of how that RODOH forum operates. It's called cherry-picking and you are a consummate master. You would not last one second in a court-room my friend with your approach - unless it was one of the show-trials you so love to rely upon.

The ball is in your court...


Best regards

Richard

Re: You gutless sociopath!
...
Thu, February 18, 2010 2:18:35 PM
From:
Guadalupe Salcedo [Chat now]
...
View Contact
To: Richard Axxxx
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/02/owner-of-this-website.html

From: Guadalupe Salcedo
To: Richard Axxxx
Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 8:00:35 PM
Subject: Re: You gutless sociopath!

PS: That would be "laugh their heads off". Sorry for the mistake. English is not my native language.


From: Guadalupe Salcedo
To: Richard Axxxx
Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 7:59:13 PM
Subject: Re: You gutless sociopath!

I threatened legal action? There's your paranoia again, Mr. Amies.

An easier way to keep you from clogging my mailbox with your trash is to make all of it public for the folks to laugh their heads of about it.

Which is what I will do upon receiving your next message.

Cheers,
Roberto

Re: You gutless sociopath!
...
Thu, February 18, 2010 9:45:57 PM
From:
Richard Axxxx
...
View Contact
To: Guadalupe Salcedo
Dear Roberto.

I appreciate your posts on your blog. Seems you are a remorseless idiot and delusional to boot.

Let me break this down for you so you actually get it and stop embarrassing yourself with your posts.

1/ I don't own the www.hsrdb.com website you ignoramus - and you will be on the receiving end of a little bit of legal action yourself if you repeat this accusation again publicly considering your "outing" of my "name" that was linked to your associate's claims of aniti-semitism: is this clear enough for you?

We are still waiting for your Solicitor's details........................................................... and waiting...............................and waiting...............................

Have you ever heard of whois?

Just like your other "opinions" expressed online this is also exposed as complete BULLSHIT when compared to the facts.

You are FULL OF SHIT an you know it, but keep on lying anyway.

ONLINE CHALLENGE: Prove I am the owner of www.hsrdb.com and I will give you £1000.00

CAN'T: Then Give ME and HSRDB an APOLOGY you gutless egghead!

Bet you wont - because facts and TRUTH are of NO INTEREST TO YOU.


Furthermore when did I clam to be a Solicitor?

Another "interpretation" of the facts to suit your delusions?


ONLINE CHALLENGE: Prove I claimed to be a Solicitor and I will give you £1000.00

CAN'T: Then Give ME an APOLOGY you gutless egghead!

Any reasonable person would have understood my outrage at your attempting to "out" me as an anti-semite (a highly offensive and derogatory term) using my "real" name online because I dared express common arguments about the holocaust to generate interest in a website project I was working on. You or your associate hacked my email account and accessed personal and sensitive emails. But not you.

Many hours and thousands of pounds were spend responding to this security threat.

You are so delusional you seem to think this is OK.

You then decide to prove you had no valor whatsoever by blatantly ignoring my clear invitation for an apology to end our dispute, instead posting more BS online via your blog.

Well, now I have have a little something for you and will explain the purpose of the "roberto" website because obviously you are not so bright.

We registered it to get you to visit it. YES YOU - and your IP address - which we captured with EVERY VISIT - after all you would be the only one who would bother to go there. When you did, we captured your IP addresses and are now following up re the security breaches and our Solicitors will be contacting the service providers or owners of the IP. You might not be too popular with them, and they might be like you and not want to hear your "excuses" when forming their opinions. You would not have a problem with this of course as you ADVOCATE DISCRIMINATION AND INTOLERANCE of others.

Enjoy being on the receiving end of your own BS for a change.

And yes - Legal action IS pending as the costs associated with your little stunts have been considerable. We have instructed our Solicitors, Gillams to serve and injection against you, your dipstick buddy Sergy and your service providers. We assume most of your posts will be deleted as a precaution as we are also deliberately being ambiguous in our allegations and demanding all posts be removed. Guess there will only be your website for your followers to log-on to to get updates.

You really are a sucker, you really thought we would defame you in response to your defamation! How stupid do you think we are? Guess you assumed everyone else was as paranoid, obsessional and stupid as you. Sorry buddy, but most of us have a life...

Now for the fun part.

You were provided with a reasonable opportunity to apologize - you ignored it, confirming that you are completely unrepentant about what you did and are clearly an unbalance sociopath as originally suggested.

Your sick intention was to "out" me and my wife and children - you pathetic loser - so more lunatics like you could hopefully abuse us. Motivation?

Scaring me into silence. You are ONE SICK INDIVIDUAL.

So after careful consideration of your response with my buddies over some beers, I realized that indeed, a sociopath like you would not be troubled by exposure of you methods as you actually appear proud of them. You would presumably bask in the attention you received. We don't buy the bullshit about your anonymous employer, but thanks for the advice anyway.

So instead I have donated the site to a New Zealand guy who really likes Adolph Hitler, your hero. He tells me that under his management the site will be devoted to promoting his idol and supporting the revisionists arguments and a up-to-date source of news articles critical of your cause. Emails and forums are great as me@roberto... might start popping up with posts in the most unusual places. Absolutely no defamation of course.

You must be so excited!

Now comes the booby-prize for you.

Axxxx or Axxxx is NOT MY NAME you idiot. But I am starting to gather that we have yours right.

RichardAxxxx68@gmail.com is a DUMMY NAME used by our contributors to enter forums - DUH!!!!!!

The arguments used were selected from contributions from another forum - a PSYCHOLOGY FORUM. Anti-semitic ? You fucking idiots invented this BS and now you reject others using your own arguments....

By the way, you would have to be the BIGGEST IDIOT we have encountered during this project and have provided PROOF that some Jewish Holocaust supports are mentally unbalanced in their obsession with their "cause" and do their cause more harm than good. You have swallowed your own shit and it has made you sick - my advice to you is to get some help before you destroy your life and have a heart attack.

As for the project as I think I told you before, I could not give a fuck what you try to do; you will only make a fool of yourself and probably get sued as you ARE a resident of the EU you tosser and have already stepped over the line. Keep clocking up the actions dipstick.

Clearly you like playing with fire so you must be expecting to get burned. "Cause and effect"? lol

Bets regards, "Richard"

PS I am posting this on you forums so everyone can see what a Dickhead you are...

In one respect I fully agree with "success story" Richard: his vaunted database is no threat whatsoever to the historical record of mass murder at Treblinka extermination camp. Historiography and criminal justice (both of which Richard obviously knows as much about as a pig does about Sunday) have long learned how to deal with the "gross inconsistencies" that Richard makes a fuss and to put together an accurate account of events by crosschecking eyewitness testimonies against each other and against evidence of other categories. What Richard intends to do will rather benefit opponents of the "Revisionist" faith by putting at their disposal a handy collection of eyewitness accounts and other material about Treblinka. Absence of distortions provided, I may find things there to add to my collection of Treblinka eyewitness accounts, for instance. In this sense, Richard's work may well become a shot in the foot of "Revisionism", similar to those of Messrs. Krege and Mattogno. So please keep it up, Richard!